Install Theme

Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.

The Sun's not yellow it's chicken

JTEM whining about this & that, plus the secrets of the universe and the occasional chicken recipe.

Posts tagged Saudi Arabia

May 8 '13

The truth? You can’t handle the truth!

nolife-likelowlife:

Sugar? Yes? No? Maybe alcohol, just fermented by wheat & sugar.

Your fascism is proven by your words alone. I’ve just clearly identified it.

You haven’t identified a single thing I’ve said that you believe to be factually inaccurate.  All you’ve managed was to disagree on the tactics used.  You made some explicit claims regarding the usefulness of the tactics.  But, even then you failed to notice (much less defend) your implicit claims. For example, implicit in your claims that “studies” or whatever show that other tactics are more useful in combating terrorism is the claim that the military, State Department & CIA are either unaware of any such works (totally ignorant) or for malicious reasons known unto them alone seek to make everything worse.

Drones are a non-issue.  The number of “Innocent” people killed by drones is in the hundreds, and that’s over a period of 12 years — all of Bush’s 8 years plus Obama’s first 4 years.  They’re firing missiles designed to be able to take out tanks & structures.  They’re targeting people who make a point to locate themselves and their assets amongst civilians.  Military ordinance is going off in houses, shops and on open roads and “Collateral Damage” is still kept to a minimum. 

Secondly, everywhere that drones are deployed is in effect a war zone.  There are existing conflicts raging.  People are dying by the thousands, and have been for years.  Yet every photo of a dead woman or child you see is not only miraculously killed by drones, but U.S. drones.  Every major power on the planet used drones, yet every last photo of a dead child was killed by a U.S. drone…. and you know this because they leave watermarks or something.

Yemen is beyond you.  I won’t even try to explain it.  Pakistan is easy to grasp:  Pakistan has nuclear weapons, long range missiles to carry them and very hostile relations with India, including religious tensions.  In addition to this, the batshit crazy religious psychos being fought in Pakistan are made wet at the idea of nuclear jihad against Israel (The U.S., Europe), directly or through surrogates.  These psychos win in Pakistan and there is a nuclear war.  Period.  Nuclear weapons will be detonated.  Millions (at a minimum) are going to die, and even that BEST CASE SCENARIO is entirely dependent on such a conflict not widening, not spreading to other nations. 

Get over yourself.

12 notes View comments (via nolife-likelowlife & nolife-likelowlife)Tags: war pakistan india israel yemen saudi arabia nuclear weapons warheads long range missiles exchange drones hype propaganda strikes drone strikes use state department military CIA JTEM is always right

May 5 '13
I think you’re crazy if you want us in Syria.
Look:  The United States is always attacked for everything it does and everything it doesn’t do.  Thus, no matter what course we choose the assorted revolutionaries, poseurs & professional contradictionists are going to complain.  We might as well chose what’s easiest & cheapest for us.
    …in this case that would be NOT getting involved.
The government of Syria sucks.  At the same time, the lunatic religious wankers that would replace the present government would also suck.  From our perspective it’s a damned if you do/damned if you don’t situation, but at least if we don’t get involved we’ll save a lot of money & bother.
So screw Syria.  There are no “Lines” to be crossed, not as far as any of us are concerned.

I think you’re crazy if you want us in Syria.

Look:  The United States is always attacked for everything it does and everything it doesn’t do.  Thus, no matter what course we choose the assorted revolutionaries, poseurs & professional contradictionists are going to complain.  We might as well chose what’s easiest & cheapest for us.

    …in this case that would be NOT getting involved.

The government of Syria sucks.  At the same time, the lunatic religious wankers that would replace the present government would also suck.  From our perspective it’s a damned if you do/damned if you don’t situation, but at least if we don’t get involved we’ll save a lot of money & bother.

So screw Syria.  There are no “Lines” to be crossed, not as far as any of us are concerned.

(Source: instaconservative)

102 notes View comments (via nolife-likelowlife & instaconservative)Tags: syria foreign policy U.S. UN Israel Saudi Arabia secular state terrorism terrorist supporting state Syria always has been and their replacement will be just as bad damned if you do damned if you don't intervention poseurs wannabes revolutionaries social justice conservatives

Apr 24 '13
This is actually something of a lie of omission.
Yes, Reagan did arm & train what we now call Al Qaeda back in the 1980s, but it wasn’t just Reagan.  Years before the U.S. supplied the Afghan rebels with stinger anti-aircraft missiles they were already touting British ordnance.
That never gets mentioned, does it?
And the U.S. aid came at the direct insistence of the Saudi Arabian government.  You know, the same Saudi Arabia which was home to 15 of the 19 terrorists who conducted the 9/11 attacks.  That Saudi Arabia.
And, please, long before Afghanistan & Reagan you could find middle eastern terrorists armed to the teeth with eastern-block weapons and explosives.  Most of it came by way of other governments like Syria and Libya. I guess you can pretend all the communist governments were ignorant of the final destination of their weapons, but only if you’re a goddamn fool.
Now go back to pretending the world is oh so black & white, so binary, where the U.S. invents terrorism and everyone else are victims.
It’s pathetic, but you all do it so well…

This is actually something of a lie of omission.

Yes, Reagan did arm & train what we now call Al Qaeda back in the 1980s, but it wasn’t just Reagan.  Years before the U.S. supplied the Afghan rebels with stinger anti-aircraft missiles they were already touting British ordnance.

That never gets mentioned, does it?

And the U.S. aid came at the direct insistence of the Saudi Arabian government.  You know, the same Saudi Arabia which was home to 15 of the 19 terrorists who conducted the 9/11 attacks.  That Saudi Arabia.

And, please, long before Afghanistan & Reagan you could find middle eastern terrorists armed to the teeth with eastern-block weapons and explosives.  Most of it came by way of other governments like Syria and Libya. I guess you can pretend all the communist governments were ignorant of the final destination of their weapons, but only if you’re a goddamn fool.

Now go back to pretending the world is oh so black & white, so binary, where the U.S. invents terrorism and everyone else are victims.

It’s pathetic, but you all do it so well…

5,098 notes View comments (via nolife-likelowlife & did-you-kno)Tags: Reagan thatcher British U.K. uk Afghanistan taliban al qaeda MAK Saudi Arabia Libya Syria Egypt Jordan Lebanon middle east terrorism military aid CIA covert operation KBG Cuba eastern europe China

Apr 8 '13

3 notes View comments Tags: feminism feminists women equality islam muslim sexism misogyny slavery pathetic and douche bags defend this stuff can you believe this question mark ? Saudi Arabia backwards dark ages inequality repression sexist islam's shame muslim sexism social justice apologists excuse making anti white anti western

Mar 30 '13

View comments Tags: saudi arabia communicable disease pandemic deadly SARS 65% mortality rate very high more than one out of two die killed spread conditions plague global global pandemic

Mar 28 '13

Riyadh, Ar Riyad, Saudi Arabia

Do I actually have a follower in Saudi Arabia?

I find this VERY hard to believe…

View comments Tags: riyahd ar riyad saudi arabia tumblr dashboard follow follower follow back follow through follow up oil money but no women drivers JTEM police FBI CIA international incident information block blocking speech free speech opinion dont like nope discuss

Mar 24 '13
theuncolonizedmind:

spacecadet:

Mainstream feminism illustrated perfectly. 

yes.


Three real-life examples please.
Thus far, the only “Crime” of white feminists yet identified was their saying that a woman of color shouldn’t be in a physically abusive relationship…. and they were right about that.
The Muslim world is sexist.  It’s over the top sexist.  I know you don’t want this to be true but so what?  It is true.  Now do something about it OTHER THAN blaming some “white people” for noticing….

theuncolonizedmind:

spacecadet:

Mainstream feminism illustrated perfectly. 

yes.

Three real-life examples please.

Thus far, the only “Crime” of white feminists yet identified was their saying that a woman of color shouldn’t be in a physically abusive relationship…. and they were right about that.

The Muslim world is sexist.  It’s over the top sexist.  I know you don’t want this to be true but so what?  It is true.  Now do something about it OTHER THAN blaming some “white people” for noticing….

1,167 notes View comments (via theuncolonizedmind & spacecadet)Tags: hypocrisy anti white racism race baiting islamic misogyny Muslim sexism sexist anti woman for crying out loud! Women can't even drive in Saudi Arabia forced to cover rags of shame poc feminism feminist women woman female girl

Mar 16 '13

View comments Tags: Islam muslim mulsims saudi arabia mecca pandemic disease plague death destruction coronavirus fifty percent one half fatal spread virus religious middle east JTEM is the best so insightful